Do “required document” and “document required” mean the same thing?

Compare the following two sentences.

A: “These are the required documents for obtaining a driver’s license.” 

B: “These are the documents required to obtain a driver’s license.” 

The intent of these sentences are the same. Someone is telling you what those documents are. However, grammar is different for these sentences.

The Difference is in the Grammar

A: “These are the required documents for obtaining a driver’s license.”

“Required” is an adjective. “Documents” is a noun. “The required documents” is a modified noun. It’s a noun with description.

B: “These are the documents required to obtain a driver’s license.”

“The documents required” is a part of a reduced relative clause. The sentence can be rewritten as,

“These are the documents which are required to obtain a driver’s license.”

You take out “which are” to make the sentence shorter.

Get it?

“Required documents” = a modified noun

“Documents required” = “Documents which are required” = a relative clause

The same logic goes for the difference between “a constructed building” and “a building constructed.” “A building which is constructed” is reduced to “a building constructed.”

The Difference is in the Grammar and Meaning

You just learned that the intent and meaning for these two sentences are the same.

A: “These are the required documents for obtaining a driver’s license.” 

B: “These are the documents required to obtain a driver’s license.” 

However in other situations, they do not always have the same meaning.

Take a look at these sentences.

C: “Josh is a responsible person.”

D: “Josh is the person responsible.” 

By these sentences alone, it's not very clear what they mean. Let's add context to them.

C: “Josh is a responsible person. He always keeps his room clean.” 

D: “Josh is the person responsible for this mess. He should clean it up.”

These two sentences say different things about Josh. It's important that you look at the whole sentence, and understand the context!

Adjectives Following a Noun

You learned that, adjectives + noun becomes a modified noun. You also learned that a relative clause can be reduced (e.g. “The person who is responsible” becomes “the person responsible).

Can adjectives come after a noun?


It’s called postnominal adjectives.

It does exist in the English language, but not too common. “The devil incarnate” and “the president elect” are some of the examples. “Devil” and “president” are a noun, and “incarnate” and “elect” are an adjective. “The incarnate devil” and “the elect president” are also possible, but from my experience I heard people using “the devil incarnate” and “the president elect” more often.

Sometimes in other languages, it is a requirement for adjectives to come after the noun. For example, in French you would say,

“J’ai un livre bleu.”

Which means, “I have a blue book.” “Livre” is book, and “bleu” is blue.

There are not so many of these postnominal adjectives in English, but they do show up time to time.

일상 영어 회화는 어느 정도 할 수 있는데...

  • 긴 문장으로 있어 보이는 영어를 구사 하고 싶다
  • 머리 속에 번역하지 않고 술술 말하고 싶다
  • 영어로 업무를 멋지게 처리하는 직장인이 되고 싶다
  • 그런 고민이 있으면 Josh와 같이 공부 합시다! 지금 메일 구독하세요!

    스팸하지 않습니다. 언제라도 구독 취소 가능. Powered by ConvertKit

    About Josh

    이 글을 쓴 사람

    52000명의 유튜브 구독자가 인정한 유튜버 영어 강사 Josh Tanaka 일본계 미국인인 Josh는 전에 통번역사와 프로젝트매니저를 했던 경험을 바탕으로 여러분이 보다 스마트한 영어를 할 수 있도록 도와 드리고 있습니다.

    • 뉴욕 출신 일본계 미국인.
    • 현재: 비즈니스 & 프레젠테이션 영어 강사, 원어민 발음 코치, 유튜버.
    • 강의: 서울교육대학교, 파고다, 인천도시공사, 미해군, 김미경 영어 스피치 트레이너.
    • 출연: EBSe, JEI 재능, 메가스터디.
    • 영어, 한국어, 일본어.
    • 좋아하는 음식은 타코스. Read more »
    무료 구독하기 →

    Leave a Comment